Lived Experience of Developing a Blended Learning Academic Programme in a Traditionally Presential University

dc.contributor.author Muyinda, Paul B
dc.contributor.author Siminyu, Samuel N
dc.contributor.author Aguti, Jessica N
dc.contributor.author Mayende, Godfrey
dc.contributor.author Nampijja, Dianah
dc.contributor.author Kajumbula, Richard
dc.contributor.author Mayanja, Jamiah
dc.contributor.author Ssebbowa, Dorothy K
dc.contributor.author Nabushawo, Harriet
dc.contributor.author Kabugo, David
dc.contributor.author Walimbwa, Michael
dc.contributor.author Mbulankende, Julius S
dc.contributor.author Turyakira, Nazarius
dc.contributor.author Isabwe, Ghislain M N
dc.coverage.spatial Pan-Commonwealth en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2019-08-31T04:18:07Z
dc.date.available 2019-08-31T04:18:07Z
dc.date.issued 2019-09
dc.description.abstract Information and communication technologies (ICTs) are presenting pedagogical affordances that are not only being embraced by open distance learning universities but also traditional presential universities. Presential universities are adopting blended learning and teaching approaches in their provisions albeit with some resistance from some staff. This paper shares the experiences and lessons learned from developing the Master of Instructional Design and Technology (MIDT) blended learning curriculum in a traditional presential university. The lessons are drawn from three (3) research questions, namely: 1) What process steps are traditional presential universities taking in the design and development of blended learning curriculum? 2) What is compelling presential universities to adopt blended learning? 3) How are presential universities metamorphosing into blended learning? The paper takes a case study approach employing in-depth document analysis and personal experience explications from staff at the heart of developing curriculum. Findings indicate that contemporary realities such as globalization, increased emphasis on learner-centeredness, increased proliferation of ICTs and others are disrupting the ivory tower traditions and practices of presential universities. These universities are being compelled to open up their gates to non-traditional learners through blended learning, but with a lot more caution. The caution is evidenced by the great amount of rigor invoked in the process of approving blended learning curricula as compared to traditional face-to-face curricula. As such champions of blended learning curricula in presential universities should be prepared to spend more time, energy and resources to have blended learning curricula approved. Putting in place policies and strategies for spurring blended learning; sensitizing staff on the affordances of blended learning and training faculty on how to employ blended pedagogy should take centre stage. Further, the top management of these universities need to be involved at all levels of blended learning curriculum development. // Paper ID 167 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11599/3338
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Commonwealth of Learning (COL) en_US
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ en_US
dc.subject Online Learning en_US
dc.subject Distance Education en_US
dc.subject Open and Distance Learning (ODL) en_US
dc.subject Hybrid/Blended Learning en_US
dc.title Lived Experience of Developing a Blended Learning Academic Programme in a Traditionally Presential University en_US
dc.type Working Paper en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
PCF9_Papers_paper_167.pdf
Size:
233.28 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
PDF
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: