New Approaches to Quality and Standards for New Forms and Modes of Learning?
New Approaches to Quality and Standards for New Forms and Modes of Learning?
dc.contributor.author | Daniel, John | |
dc.coverage.placeName | Australia | en_US |
dc.coverage.spatial | Pacific | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-08-28T22:36:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-08-28T22:36:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008-07-08 | |
dc.description.abstract | So my title is: New Approaches to Quality and Standards for New Forms and Modes of Learning? There is a question mark at the end of the title. Whether new forms and modes of learning actually require new approaches to quality and standards is a basic question. Some would argue that quality is quality and standards are standards; so that if you assure quality and measure standards properly new modes and forms of learning should not require new approaches.// Let's park that question for a moment. I want first to explain why it's a pleasure to be in Canberra again after a gap of only three months, and then to expand on the honour of addressing you at this AQUA Forum.// After that I will look at four new forms and modes of learning in order to ask whether they need new approaches to quality and standards. Those forms and modes are: first, degree mills; second, private for-profit provision; third, open and distance learning; and, fourth, open educational resources. But first, a few more words about Canberra and AUQA. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11599/1257 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Commonwealth of Learning (COL) | en_US |
dc.subject | Higher Education | en_US |
dc.subject | Quality Assurance | en_US |
dc.title | New Approaches to Quality and Standards for New Forms and Modes of Learning? | en_US |
dc.type | Presentation | en_US |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1

- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.71 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: